| 
  
        
        
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 26
 1964 
                        - Renascence Project
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   Matt 
                      Taylor and Max StormesDesign-Build-Use
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona - Outside of Lake Havasue City
 Not Built
 Max and I along with a couple form New York bought 
                      several hundred acres of land in Arizona. The idea was to 
                      build a community of artist designers. Business disagreements 
                      and the death of our partners in a car accident left the 
                      project forever on paper. The ultimate size of this project 
                      would have been large (several hundred families) 
                      even though the sense of scale was deliberately kept intimate. 
                      The project was designed so that much of its infrastructure 
                      was underground with only the tops of the interconnected 
                      buildings showing almost like eruptions out of the steep, 
                      rugged landscape. Parking was to be kept to a single place 
                      at the entry to the property and project.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 27
 1964 
                        - Cluster Housing Community
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona
 Study
 A By this time, I had worked on several subdivisions 
                      of hundreds of houses each for developers and architects 
                      in California and Arizona. The land use model never worked 
                      as far as I was concerned. The lots were too 
                      big or too small depending how you looked at them. The landscape 
                      had no chance. There was a built-in tragedy of the commons. 
                      The street grid was imposed on the site and, even if not 
                      strictly rectilinear, arbitrary in terms of preserving the 
                      features of the landscape. Individual attempts at landscaping 
                      the small strips of land around and between houses resulted 
                      in a hodgepodge of solutions. this is not effecient land 
                      use nor is it ecologically sound development. The idea of 
                      cluster housing is to create very small lots (all of which 
                      are totally buildable) and group then in clusters around 
                      a front commons with the lots opening onto commons areas 
                      that cannot be closed off or built upon. The character of 
                      the landscape is maintained, owners have less land 
                      to take care of and the same density (or even greater) is 
                      accomplished with a sense of greater open space. Some aspect 
                      s of these ideas became common in development like on Hilton 
                      Head Island but have never reflected the level of design 
                      that I had in mind.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 28
 1965 
                        - Three Houses on a Cul_De_Sac
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   Phoenix 
                      Developer and BankDesign
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona
 Not Built
 This was a case of a client coming for something 
                      different, getting what they asked for, then saying the 
                      could not build it because it was different.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 29
 1965 
                        - Pool and House Addition
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   John 
                      and Wally ShamyDesign-Build
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona
 Built
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 30
 1965 
                        - Zoned Pool and patio
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   XxxxDesign
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona
 Built
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 31
 1967 
                        - Picture Frame Shop
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   XxxxDesign
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona
 Built Without Supervision
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 32
 1967 
                        - Hexagonal Residence
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   XxxxDesign
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona
 Not Built
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 33
 1967 
                        - Desert Oasis
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDeign
 Matt Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona
 Study
 This design came about as the result of a challenge. 
                      I was teaching a course in architectural design and had 
                      concluded the section on the use of connotation and denotation 
                      in the development of theme in the design process. The students 
                      wanted an example. I Gave them a half hour to come up with 
                      a project and told them that I would respond on the spot 
                      with a design. Naturally, they made the problem (in their 
                      mind) as difficult as they could. Difficult, in this case, 
                      by coming up with a building type - that on the surface 
                      of it - had no real intrinsic architectural value or opportunity: 
                      a gas station, rest stop, eating facility on the highway 
                      mid way between Phoenix and Tucson. Of course, it was easy 
                      - and - illustrated the utility of the technique of employing 
                      connotation as the translator between program and architectural 
                      concept.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 34
 1967 
                        - Zoned Residence
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   XxxxDesign
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona
 Not Built
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona
 Project
 This began my thinking about separating the shell 
                      of the building from the interior elements - in other words, 
                      build a building within a building. The shell become the 
                      environment value much like the atmosphere is to the Earth 
                      and its inhabitants. Inside, one lives in a waterproofed 
                      temperate climate therefor allowing lightweight, adjustable 
                      inexpensive building components. An adaptable habitat that 
                      adjusts to the inhabitants not the other way around. The 
                      majority of my work, starting with this one and continuing 
                      through work # 63, takes a new turn. A set of issues 
                      came to the fore: energy and food self-sufficiency, new 
                      strategies for siting and building adaptability/mobility, 
                      new economic and collaborative use models. Cohousing is 
                      the term that is used today for a movement that has been 
                      strong in Europe since the 60s and has increasingly found 
                      support in the US since the 70s. I was unaware of all this 
                      when I started this investigation. The economics, as well 
                      as, the community aspect hit you in the face the minute 
                      a little thought is given too it. Or, another way of saying 
                      it is that the economics of the single family dwelling and 
                      suburban sprawl taken to the extreme are what hit you in 
                      the face. In the ecology of architectural types there certainly 
                      is a place for the single family dwelling but it is far 
                      from the best model for the default solution 
                      for general housing.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 36
 1969 
                        - Sphere House
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Phoenix, Arizona
 Project
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign-Facilitate
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Published
 A project of great importance. The present adversarial 
                      process between city and state governments and individual 
                      builders, owners and users and community groups is netting 
                      out to the destruction of architecture and planet. There 
                      is no reason for this. A better METHOD 
                      is possible. The Kansas City Master Plan proposed a 11 mile 
                      pedestrian mall down what is now Main Street (red line). 
                      It connects all the major nodes (green/grey areas) from 
                      the old airport on the North to Ward Parkway Shopping Center 
                      on the South. Between these two poles are several places 
                      of economic and cultural interest - the main concentration 
                      is in the shaded (grey) areas of the map. And, all kinds 
                      of built environments and communities of many cultures and 
                      economic strata are contained in the one mile band on either 
                      side of Main Street, The Boulder 
                      Mall build later in the decade accomplished, on a much 
                      smaller scale, the character of environment I envisioned 
                      for the shaded area. Transportation would be provided by 
                      a (very) light rail trolley system with high density automobile 
                      parking garages a block off of Main Street about every half 
                      mile. The idea was that the Mall could be built as part 
                      of a Worlds Fair celebration. The nodes that I speak 
                      of were, at the time, strong concentrations of educational, 
                      cultural, recreational commercial, retailing and residential 
                      districts. They have continued to develop over the the last 
                      three decades. Every kind of civic function and building-type 
                      can be found in this 12 square mile area. Main Street remains 
                      a major corridor but little still ties theses areas together. 
                      General developed has helped, however, the entire area still 
                      lacks an Armature. 
                      The paradox is, that one of these nodes is the famous multi-block 
                      Nichols PLAZA 
                      which is regarded as the worlds first shopping center. 
                      It is still viable today and a clear demonstration how urban 
                      development can be done. The truly radical aspect of this 
                      project, however, was the transparency of the method. It 
                      was this aspect that is missing from development and why 
                      development is limited to the scope that any one developer 
                      can control or flips to the huge government 
                      controlled mega-projects that tend to be dead on arrival. 
                      The interesting thing about this project, specifically, 
                      is that to a stranger moving to Kansas City, this KC 
                      Strip was trying to happen. It is still trying to 
                      happen. Yet, the social mechanism in place cannot facilitate 
                      it happening. When a natural like this cannot 
                      be brought about, in a city that has - by conventional standards 
                      - extremely good stewardship from prominent individuals 
                      and corporations, then imagine the plight of most American 
                      cities that grew up not blessed with any natural or (even 
                      simi) human-built Armature. All that is left is sprawl. 
                      It was my intention that the areas off the Mall be turned 
                      into mixed use developments and also employ the other design 
                      strategies I developed at the time: co-housing, Domiciles, 
                      movable buildings and alternative energy systems. See Works 
                      #35, #38, #42, #48, #50, 
                      #53,#58 and #61, #68. Because 
                      of the landscape and park system which could be extended 
                      and connected to each other and other parks, a couple of 
                      mega-structures would have fit in time (#70). the 
                      result of this approach - and it can be done today - would 
                      be a diverse, rich urban landscape that made PLACE 
                      and fit the requirements of all the people-types and work-life 
                      styles that make up a replacement city culture.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 38
 1971 
                        - Yurt House
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Concept
 A modern tent for a very simple and inexpensive lifestyle. 
                      Comfortable, fun, easy on the landscape. About a week to 
                      build and site - a couple of days to take away. Can we use 
                      land like animals and indigenous peoples? What is the actual 
                      value in cementing structures to the ground? Try living 
                      in a garden under a translucent roof protected by earth 
                      berms of flowering plants. This is not prestige housing. 
                      It is simple, affordable, organic and focussed on natural 
                      processes and systems. It is shelter that can be experienced 
                      as shelter not life removed from the world outside.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 39
 1972 
                        - Drive-in Theater Buildings
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   Commonwealth 
                      Theaters, Inc.Design
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Not Built
 One of my first uses of suspension structures. The 
                      idea of the design was to promoted the easy reuse of land. 
                      If buildings can be easily moved, it is possible to better 
                      accommodate the economic cycles of real estate. In the early 
                      periods of land development, land is almost always underdeveloped. 
                      As land grows in value, buildings are torn down and replaced. 
                      This is expensive and ecologically unsound. The notion is 
                      to build, in these early stages, in a way that expects and 
                      facilitates cycling buildings designed to be moved as the 
                      land use requirements change. Work #48 explored this 
                      idea further. Commonwealth was building a drive-in theater 
                      on a piece of land that clearly would soon be used for a 
                      denser use. I thought the economics would be better served 
                      to create a solution that could be moved to another similar 
                      use and so on again. Employing suspension structures makes 
                      it possible to have large structures that rest on small 
                      footings. This makes moving easier with less resulting site 
                      work.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 40
 1973 
                        - Cycle Systems Shop
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   Cycle 
                      Systems, IncorporatedDesign-Build-Operate
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri - Kansas Suburb
 Built
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 41
 1973 
                        - Ocean City
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign-Research
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Kansas City - any Ocean
 Concept
 A human made island floating in the Ocean as a way-point 
                      between land masses. Japan will do this some day. Properly 
                      done, ocean cities can be safer and have less negative ecological 
                      impact than building on the land. I am convinced that, within 
                      this century,
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 42
 1973 
                        - Dome Cluster Apartments
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Concept
 Kansas City, Missouri
 This concept has one innovation embedded in its approach. 
                      This is that a cluster of domes built out, as illustrated 
                      by Works #35 and #58, can allow a much greater 
                      penetration into the ground while still bringing light and 
                      a sense of vista to those lower levels. This can greatly 
                      increase density and reduce overall visual impact of the 
                      structure, on a typical urban lot, and also take advantage 
                      of earth-sheltered virtues. Properly done, there should 
                      be little negative sense of being underground. 
                      Although presented as a single dome and a much smaller scale, 
                      Work #53 shows that this can be accomplished. In addition, 
                      selecting which functional areas are placed in both the 
                      lower and upper areas of the domes are important to the 
                      success of the scheme. The proposed scale of this project 
                      was on the order of several Domiciles (#58) and offered 
                      as a serious alternative to typical apartment housing and 
                      the several obvious drawbacks of this typical approach: 
                      low variety, usually dull geometry, poor energy strategies,oversized 
                      footprint and scale problems, poor utilization of commons 
                      and surrounding landscape. Many of these same sins could 
                      be committed while employing the dome-cluster approach, 
                      however, intrinsic to the basic configuration are more powerful 
                      means to avoid these results. The traditional boxws within 
                      boxwes approach of the typical apartment building simply 
                      does not have the inherent variety necessary to avoid them. 
                      On a much smaller scale, the difference between office cubicles 
                      and the AI WorkPod 
                      unit illustrates (on a two-dimensional plane) what this 
                      layout accomplished in the three-dimensional realm.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri - Any Ocean Front
 Concept
 There are many ecologically sensitive areas that 
                      are are also highly desirable as human habitats. Barrier 
                      island beaches rank high in this regard. However, conventional 
                      development is both subject to periodic destruction and 
                      is also highly destructive to the natural habitat itself. 
                      A reciprocal relationship of mutual destruction. This design 
                      addresses this situation head on. It proposes a few dense 
                      (volume) mega structures that carefully leaves the vast 
                      majority of the landscape able to shift and move around 
                      these structures. Barrier islands remain stable because 
                      they can move. To attempt to built ON this kind of 
                      landscape is foolish. This schema places a few buildings 
                      that rest on vertical shafts that go deep creating a strucural 
                      stability independent of surface conditions. Horizontal 
                      stability is accomplished by tying the structures together 
                      above the beaches themselves. Indigenous landscaping is 
                      encouraged between the structures and to the beach. Traffic 
                      is limited to the bearing capacity of this ecosystem. Transportation 
                      is monorail back to car parking areas removed from the beach 
                      areas. The buildings themselves are mixed use and self-contained 
                      to the maximum possible degree. Construction is prefabricated 
                      with components airlifted in order to reduce site disturbance.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 44
 1974 
                        - Far East Bazaar Shop
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   XxxxDesign-Build-Setup Operations
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri - Kansas Suburb
 Built
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 45
 1974 
                        - Leather Shop
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   CaDe
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 St.
 Built with alterations and without supervision
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 46
 1975 
                        - Lee Wald Offices
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   Lee 
                      Wald Garment CompanyDesign and Construction Management
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Built
 A most interesting project and my first large scale 
                      office landscape. I made extensive use of interior landscaping 
                      a feature unusual at the time and still rarely done on the 
                      scale of this project. The interiors read like work stations 
                      and office in a park.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 47
 1975 
                        - Attorneys office
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   CaDe
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 St.
 Built
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 48
 1975 
                        - Movable Offices
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Kansas City
 Study
 With this project I got serious with exploring was
                       that the building type and design can better facilitate
                      
                      fitting into the life cycle economics of land value and
                       development. The idea is to make building that have utility
                      
                      and can be moved when the land value rises thus requiring
                       a different kind of building or greater density of building.
                      
                      To be able to do this without great expenditures of time
                       or money and to be able to reuse the building removed
                      in 
                      a similar situation elsewhere. In this design, this is
                      accomplished  by manufacturing a very light weight structure
                      that sits on a small core and cantilevers in all directions
                      from that core. This makes for minimal footings and space
                      for
                      
                      landscaping and parking beneath the structures.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 49
 1975 
                        - Sears House
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Study
 This concept married, retailing, computer technology, 
                      prefabricated building with the idea of a rule-based design 
                      process to provide a method capable of producing middle 
                      class housing in large numbers. I called it the Sears 
                      in recognition that Sears provided thousands of houses through 
                      its catalog in the 19th and early 20th century. A 
                      completely integrated service was designed: design, financing, 
                      field erection and maintenance service. This project took 
                      the swimming 
                      pool method, automated it and extended it to the entire 
                      country and, ultimately, the world.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Concept
 A return to the question: What is the Minimum 
                      Living Unit that provides a sustainable, beautiful and 
                      satisfying life? Affordable housing is not just scaling 
                      down the building to what can be afforded - 
                      it is about shedding things and costs that do not add value 
                      to a life. Where is the contemplative life? 
                      At what point does individual housing become both an individual 
                      and social cost far greater than the value received? As 
                      a society, we have not explored the top end 
                      of affluent housing - we have not adequately explored the 
                      intrinsic value of more modest approaches. I do not believe 
                      we know what true luxury is - we certainly do not know what 
                      is sustainable. Long term mortgages and the tactics of buying 
                      to sell for capital gains has destroyed the vast majority 
                      of domestic architecture. The home has become a commodity 
                      not a place of beauty and refuge.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 51
 1975 
                        - Savings and Loan Bank Building
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   CaDe
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 St.
 Built and still in sevice
 A 1
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   Harold 
                      SteinmeyerDesign-Build
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri - Kansas suburb
 Not Built
 My first self contained house design for a client. 
                      The house is a homestead designed to be worked 
                      like a landscape. It rests on a different concept of lifestyle 
                      than conventional architecture. Structurally, the Steinmeyer 
                      Residence s system is a precursor to the Bay 
                      Area Studio project (# 96). Both the main house 
                      (to the right in the elevation) and the carport (to the 
                      left) are prefabricated wood sections suspended on steel 
                      cables that hang from the masonry core units.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   Richard 
                      S. HaitchDesign-Build
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Not Built
 A large house in a traditional neighborhood that had been 
                      turning into a rooming house. How to expand it without compromising 
                      either the addition or the existing architecture? The answer 
                      was a berm protected geodesic dome connected 
                      to the house by a bridge.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 54
 1975 
                        - Learning Pods
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Concept
 Multimedia educational Pods that can be set up anywhere 
                      (singly or in clusters). The base contains the energy pack 
                      and other necessary service technologies. A student gets 
                      a meter cube full of tools, books, multimedia and connectivity. 
                      Teachers have their own for one-on-one sessions and clusters 
                      of Pods make up commons for larger assembly. Instant school. 
                      Several cubes can be connected to form commons areas for 
                      group learning and social events. The land is not disturbed 
                      so schools can be built quickly and reconfigured as demographics 
                      change. The economy of scale can make the Pods economical. 
                      They can also be used for instant offices in fast growth 
                      situations. Once again demonstrating the utility of separating 
                      the building from the ground upon which it is (temporarily) 
                      placed. Schools built on these distributed learning 
                      principles can be useful when responding to poorer locations 
                      and Nations without traditional industrial infrastructure. 
                      Each student gets their own portal to their future universe. 
                      Remote teaching/learning, as well as, on site and peer-to-peer 
                      teaching/learning is facilitated.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 55
 1975 
                        - Space Spome - project
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt 
                      Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Study
 Iasiac Asomoff wrote a speculative nonfiction book 
                      in the 70s that looked at, among other subjects, space travel. 
                      He proposed Spomes - for Space Homes 
                      - as a means to head to the stars earlier not after greater 
                      drives were developed. His idea was to take a good sized 
                      asteroid, hollow it out, put a critical mass of people in 
                      it and boost it toward the nearest star system. No matter 
                      if it took several generations because people would live 
                      in it doing mostly what they do now living on the surface 
                      of Space Ship Earth. A great idea and much closer 
                      to present technology than proposed higher tech solutions. 
                      This is a great place by the way for nuclear energy. You 
                      just put the generating plant on the outside of the asteroid 
                      and let it do what it does. The inhabitants are separated 
                      from any radiation by a couple miles of rock.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 56
 1975 
                        - Organic City
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Concept
 This model shows the real reason for building three dimensionally. 
                      Most skyscrapers are merely stacks of one floor 
                      many times - this fails to lever the intrinsic opportunities 
                      inherent in the Mega Structure. This schema also provides 
                      both mixed and single use zoning in harmony with one another 
                      - a spectacular AND instead of either-or. Each zone 
                      is a ribbon that crosses one another at intervals creating 
                      mixed-use intersections that also tie to other nodes vertically. 
                      A simple idea - a profound change in the character of the 
                      city.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, MO - Concept
 Concept
 The idea of this project is to build a series of 
                      more-or-less self contained habitats each an order of magnitude 
                      larger than the one before. In this way technical, social 
                      and economic issues can be solved as the population increases 
                      as does self-sufficiency. In a number of discreet steps 
                      a space ready habit is formed - each project, however, is 
                      designed to be useful and profitable in its own right. 
                      The social and biological aspects of space habitats will 
                      prove to be far more complex than the strictly technical 
                      challenges as daunting as they appear now. This theme is 
                      revisited in the design for NASA in 2000 (#99) only 
                      it is the economic and business aspects of going into space 
                      that are the focus of the later work.
 
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Concept
 This 
                      version of Domicile further developed the technical concepts 
                      raised by Work #32. The double shell construction 
                      is designed to provide a band of 56 degree air continuously 
                      circulating along the entire perimeter in winter and summer. 
                      Various heat-sinks will be utilized to further augment this 
                      natural air-conditioning. Members of the community will 
                      rent space by volume and build their 
                      habitat with whatever openness/privacy, individual tool-possession 
                      redundancy or commons use that they desire. Many expensive, 
                      low demand things are managed in commons. Double the lifestyle 
                      amenity at half the cost. Double the land use density with 
                      far more open spaces. CoHousing it would be called today 
                      and an idea I am sure will catch on for a number of social 
                      and economic reasons. A lage green house provides a basic 
                      diet and energy.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Concept
 The entire skin of this building is designed to metabolize. 
                      It is a semi-permeable membrane. The building automatically 
                      opens and closes to the outside, shields itself or exposes 
                      to the sun and transfers temperature differences from one 
                      part to another. This structure is to be built in a wilderness 
                      area with only monorail (or walking) access. It is designed 
                      to be a health city where people go to renew and reconnect 
                      with nature and themselves. 
                      The economic idea is that health professionals would build 
                      and own the retreat facility and then run it like a hotel. 
                      For a single charge a guest could stay and access a variety 
                      of physical and mental health services. Specially services 
                      and intensive treatment would be charged in addition to 
                      the basic fee. Here, one gets healthy by living in a healthy 
                      way. The main role of the health professional 
                      is to be healthy, teach health and to deal with acute 
                      issues as a last resort. The size of this structure is is 
                      large. It is 85 stories above ground and about 15 stories 
                      below it. The stalactites hanging down from the bowl-shape 
                      are living complexes equivalent to a 20 to 25 story apartment 
                      building.
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Concept
 Modern building are designed backwards - they start 
                      with a box and work in. This attenuates the natural 
                      variety that human life requires. Here is a building built 
                      of three prefabricated units that offers a huge variety 
                      of exposure, views and layout amenities. Perfect for a mixed 
                      use community development. 
                      A population of a few thousand can be accommodated in a 
                      structure of this type freeing up acres and acres of land 
                      for recreation, farming and natural animal habitat. The 
                      arrangement of zones can follow the schema of of the Organic 
                      City (Work #56). Because the basic structural components 
                      can be prefabricated, a project like this can be completed 
                      in a number of months - not years. A system of light weigh 
                      components would be provided so that tenants can rearrange 
                      their spaces as they desire. Following the Domicile idea, 
                      they would take over vertical and horizontal space and then 
                      build out what they desire within the armature of mega-structure. 
                      This is exactly how NavCenters and knOwhere Stores are now 
                      done only a project like this would be on recursion up in 
                      scale. This was, in the 1970s, and certainly is now (25 
                      years later) a completely feasible concept.
 
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 61
 1978 
                        - EcoSphere Garden
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   Renascence 
                      Project Design - Build - Use
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Not Built
 This project was for experiment and fun. A combination 
                      green house and hot tub - recreation facility for members 
                      of the Renascence Project. It is designed to be totally 
                      removed from the site with minimum expense and damage. 
                      The Renascence Library, at the time, had a commons house 
                      that, besides the Library itself, housed a kitchen that 
                      served diner nightly for any member who wished to attend. 
                      The idea was for the kitchen and dining facilities to be 
                      moved into this greenhouse. This would have provided a prototype 
                      opportunity for a restaurant concept that I have long harbored 
                      - and still do (Work #22). As can be seen from the 
                      section view, the entire facility rests on wood and gravel 
                      foundations. This is a structure that can be dismantled 
                      and moved to another site and the site returned to its 
                      original state. The gravel bed acts as a heat sink. Above 
                      the gravel bed, wood sectioned French intensive garden beds 
                      surround the full dome parameter. Entry is through a tube 
                      that is actually at grade level. The curve of the dome is 
                      continued inside with brick set in sand over the gravel 
                      bed. 6 wood poles support 5 levels of platforms inside the 
                      dome. A cistern functions as supply for plant watering and 
                      additional thermal mass. The cistern is fed from the entire 
                      dome surface and structures parameter. The Dome, itself, 
                      is to be fabricated out of wood members covered with a series 
                      of skin layers made of canvas, translucent and clear plastic 
                      and screening. These layers to be adjusted by a series of 
                      block and tackle like rigging on a traditional sail boat. 
                      This way the skin of the building can be easily adjusted 
                      to match external conditions with the desired interior climate. 
                      An excellent application of this design would be a summer 
                      cabin in a temperate climate. The entire environment could 
                      be run like a boat with the skin taken off and stored for 
                      the winter like sails. This design could also serve as temporary 
                      housing in some circumstances. Another application for this 
                      concept could be a school project - a great way for jr. 
                      high and high school students to learn HABITAT.
 
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |  
                      Work 62
 1978 
                        - New School
 |  
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   Matt 
                      and Gail TaylorDesign - Build - Use
 Matt Taylor
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Concept
 The modern version of the one-room school house. 
                      Two teachers and up to 60 students. Mixed grades. 21st Century 
                      Curriculum. The what if was what would be the 
                      minimum cost for the maximum educational experience. Units 
                      like these can out perform the existing system and educate 
                      balanced 21st Century citizens. 
                      The idea was to put students in an environment of 
                      learning and facilitate that process as they explore, teach 
                      each other and do projects. This would function much like 
                      the NavCenters and knOwhere Stores we built today two and 
                      a half decades later. The structure itself would have large 
                      group areas, small study niches, multimedia, a working greenhouse 
                      and library. The students would do much of the work necessary 
                      for keeping the environment. A wide age range would be attend. 
                      In education, perhaps more that any process, the physical 
                      environment sets the character of the learning modalities. 
                      This is true on the level of process and interaction styles. 
                      It is equally true on the level of individual learning styles 
                      and cognitive processes.
 
 |  
 |  
           
            | 
                 
                  |   Client: 
                      Work:
 Design:
 Location:
 Status:
 Notes:
 |   ProjectDesign & Manufacture
 Matt Taylor with Laura Starr
 Kansas City, Missouri
 Concept
 About a hundred pieces arrive in a small truck. Excavate 
                      for the green house (using the dirt for earth berms), place 
                      the prefabricated sections on temporary wood footing and 
                      stay awhile. The cabin is self contained, grows 
                      a basic diet. When done, the land is returned to its 
                      original condition. EcoSphere 
                      was designed to sit on wood foundations a technique I used 
                      for the Instead Project (#72) which is doing fine 
                      21 years later. The entire skin of this structure is conceived 
                      as a breathing membrane. Inside and outside layers of material 
                      are employed to deal with weather, light, sound, airflow. 
                      There is a vertical shaft that runs from the utility room 
                      pedestal to the top. This contains utilities, lines, wires, 
                      pipes and so on. It also supports the cantilevered platforms 
                      for sleeping and study. The Living Area is the bottom of 
                      the dome and the soft covered floor is level and sloped 
                      in different places to accommodate sitting, walking, lounging. 
                      The greenhouse holds the kitchen, hot tub and growing areas. 
                      It is also an active and passive solar system. It goes without 
                      saying that the users orientation to the site is very different 
                      in this work that the traditional building. The view in 
                      and out of the structure is not constrained. This creates 
                      an unique viewpoint on the world. The effect of the this 
                      is not trivial.
 
 |  
 |  
           
            | The 
                work designed in Phoenix and Kansas City between 1964 and 1979 
                consisted of 38 projects in 15 years nine of which were built.  This 
                period ended with a new nuance in my architecture. The built environments 
                place in society had a different meaning to me than when 
                I started this cycle of work. I started my work thinking of architecture 
                as ART in the traditional sense. I ended this period applying 
                architecture to the task of solving human and social problems. 
                I do not believe that this is at sacrifice to art - done right, 
                art and life augment one another. By this time USE 
                had become part of my practice model. The next 22 years became, 
                almost exclusively, the application of this idea. To me, even 
                the best of our present architecture - architecture of great artistic 
                and technological quality - architecture that can be considered 
                modern in every sense but one, FAILS in one respect: the 
                paradigm of USE. The most advanced works are still based 
                on 19th Century concepts of building types and processes modified 
                by new technologies and incremental design strategies. At the 
                ROOT of it, little has changed. This is particularly true 
                of the so called modern 
                workplace.
 The 
                PROCESSES on which architecture based are not adequate. Another 
                reoccurring theme, during this period, was the relationship of 
                the building both to the landscape in general and the ground in 
                particular. It became clear to me how devastating the traditional 
                marriage of building to ground can be in many (not all) circumstances. 
                Earth and building can and should be intimately connected in that 
                architecture designed to last for centuries. A good portion, however, 
                of architecture is more transient for many social and economic 
                reasons. This is particularly true in the early periods of land 
                development. In this case, a different strategy is required. Employing 
                (and deploying) architecture that can easily be sited, used and 
                moved radically changes the development 
                process and the economic basis upon which it sits. Different 
                strategies of ownership (stewardship) are also critical if we 
                are to avoid the unnecessary wholesale destruction of our landscape 
                and ecology. By 
                the end of SCAN (1952 through 1979), I had explored in 
                my own design work and my work for other architects, builders 
                and developers, almost every building type, social application 
                and economic context that still interests me today. This makes 
                up and architecture of solution types that can act as a 
                high level pattern language to a variety of specific design challenges. 
                This is a legacy that I intend to develop over the coming years. The 
                FOCUS phase, that followed this beginning phase, lasted 
                22 years before the transition to ACT started to get underway. 
                Indeed, the Focus phase may overlap Act and last a few years yet. 
                I never expected this, of course. However, there has been a heuristic 
                logic to my architectural efforts which has now, slowly, gone 
                full cycle back to the beginning. It does add up although it take 
                a broad perspective to see it.The Focus phase corresponds, roughly, 
                with the development of the MG Taylor family of corporations and 
                their maturation in the marketplace. The close coupling of process, 
                technology and environment and the iterative learning and prototyping 
                of design, build, use methods composed this Focus work. 
                The later projects, starting with #96, are the transition 
                works to ACT.    
                Part 1a 
                 Part 
                2 of 3  Part 
                3 of 3  Narrative 
                 
                   |  Matt 
          TaylorPalo Alto
 March 24, 2001
 
 SolutionBox 
          voice of this document:VISION  STRATEGY  EVALUATION
 
 posted 
          March 24, 2001  revised 
          May 18, 2001 
          20010324.242345.mt  20010407.21124356.mt 
           20010407.778932.mt 
  20010408.663981.mt  20010414.283622.mt 
           200010506.376651.mt 
  20010413.299122.mt  
          20010518.543291.mt  20011115.542987.mt 
          
  20011221.298888.mt 
 (note: 
          this document is about 50% finished) Matt 
          Taylor 650 814 1192  
          me@matttaylor.com Copyright© 
          Matt Taylor 1958, 1960, 1962, 1971, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1978, 1979, 
          2001   
 |