| 
                               |                                                                                                                       |                                                                                       | Authentic                            architecture [link] is                            highly condition-dependent. This fact can be seen                            throughout history and it                            has been consistent for all formal, as well as, vernacular                            architecture of great quality. Architecture is the                            expression of its society and it can be no other                            way. |  |                                    |                                                                     | And,                            conditions at any given time can be appropriate for                            the flowering of one kind of architecture and not                            others. In focus here is the question if the appropriate                            conditions exist today for the creation - at some                            significant scale - of affordable, sustainable                            housing                            for living, work and recreation, that the average                            working family can procure and maintain. |  |                                    |                                                                   | The                            standard by which I measure success in this venture                            is Frank Lloyd Wright’s Usonian Houses predominately                            built in the 1930s and 40s with some                            examples in the 1950s. I consider these houses to                            be the state-of-the-art of their kind and                            one of the greatest architectural achievements of                            all time.                            The purpose of the postUsonian Project is                            to restate and recreate this architecture in a way                            that is appropriate                            [link] to the 21st century and its conditions. |  |                                    |                                           | A                            book that beautifully captures the spirit of these                            houses and the principles behind them is Wright-Sized                            Houses by Diane Maddex with photos by Christian                            Korab, Robert L. Wiser, Pedro E. Guerero, Tim Street-Porter                            and Michael Freeman. If you have an interest in this                            subject, this is a must-have for your bookshelf.                            It walks you through Wright’s and several of                            his client’s                            response to the challenge of designing and living                            in small, eloquent, affordable                            habitats from                                      his Oak Park days throughout his career                            and afterwad with some of the work carried                          on by Taliesin Associated Architects. |  |                                    |  |                                                                   | Wright-Sized                              Houses is a simply laid out book, full of                              beautiful photos (some samples to the left) and                              text that carefully                              explains what made Wright’s approach to the small                              house so effective. Not since The Natural House,                              written by Wright, published in the 1950s and now                              out of print, has someone spelled it out so completely.                              Diane Hadden is an author who not only understands                            - she also has a deep feeling for her subject. In                            scope, the book covers the entire length of Wright’s                              career from the Oak Park days to the Usonians and                            on to his last work. Because the book is of modest                            size and sticks to its theme, this presentation makes                              it possible to see not only the continuity and                            consistency of Wright’s approach but also his development                            as he pursued the ideal of the American home. After                              an overview, the book takes one concept and attribute                            of Wright’s work at a time, explains it and shows                            it with copious photos and plans. It then features                              a few Wright houses as examples. This book is an                              easy read. It also will reward returning to it                              time and again for careful study. I have bee studying                              Mr. Wright and his work for almost half a century                            and found many new tidbits of information and insights. I                              found the treatment of the post Wright works by                            sss and sss Lockhard and xxx, Fllw’s archivist, particularly                            appropriate. Wright-Sized Houses sets a                            good context for the many books now being published                            by and about owners of Usonian Houses [link]. Wright-Sized                              Houses is a guide, a manual and a reminder                              of how architecture can fit hand and glove with                              a way of living very much missing, today, from                              the modern experience. |  |                    | Isabel                      Roberst House - 1908 cover photograph by Christon Korab
 |                    |  |                    | First                    Jacobs House - 1936 |                    |  |                    | Pope-leighey                      House - 1939 |                    |  |                    | Sturges                      House - 1939 photograph by Michael freeman
 |                    |  |                    | Zimmerman                      House - 1951 |                    |  |                    | Tracy                      House - 1955 |                                    |                                                                   | The                            central question if there is a market today for this                            approach rests not on an esthetic judgment nor even                            on the mechanics of designing and building - as important                            as these are. It rests on the answer to the question                            if people want to live the way a home of this this                            sort                            requires. This was Mrs. Pew’s struggle when                            she first moved into her Usonian [link].                            The fact that the Usonians, and the several other                            variants of small,                            simple,                            affordable modern architecture, faded away after                            the 1950s was not so much a failure of design. It                            was                            a change in the home owner’s mind regarding                            the concept HOME. |  |                                    |                                                                   | There                            are several conditions that make up this modern life                            that work for the return of the Usonian concept,                            several                            that                            work against it and some that tend to work both ways.                            An example of the latter is the general affluence                            of our society. On one hand, this increases the number                            who can afford a home. On the other, this affluence                            is based on a set of social behaviors and norms that                            work to exclude the kind of individualistic                            and hands-on approach a Usonian requires. You just                            do not go                            out and buy this kind of house, superficially decorate                            it with an eye on its future market value, live                            in it a few years then sell it like a commodity having                            “made” a lot of money [link].                            Building codes and loan standards still remain a                            major obstacle to “unusual” architecture although                            there are signs that the lending market is beginning                            to wake up. Like the Usonian, postUsonian houses                            are likely to be built in a widely dispersed geographic                            pattern. Code and loans tend to be local if not in                            fact, in interpretation. interests that will resist                            change of this sort are definitely local. The postUsonian                            Project will have to project support broadly over                            a thinly populated opportunity terrain. This is always                            a difficult campaign. |  |                                    |                                                                   | Whatever                            the mix of pluses and minuses, the major issue will                            be that of attitude. A home like this does not come                            shrink nor do you put it in the social dumpster                            when you are finished with it. In a curious way,                            one thing that made the Usonians great was the effort                            it took to realize them. This acted as a significant                            filter. The filters are largely gone but many of                            the conditions remain. |  |                                    |                                                                                       |                                                                                           |  |                                                                           | Return                                          To postUsonian Index |  |  |                                                |                                                                                           |  |                                                                           | Return                                          To post Usonian Prototypes |  |  |  |                                    | Matt                        TaylorEslewhere
 April 21, 2004
                                               | 
 SolutionBox                              voice of this document:VISION  PHILOSOPHY  PROGRAM
 |  
 posted                        April 21, 2004 revised                        may 15, 2004 20040421.309392  20040515.366510.mt •
 (note:                        this document is about 25% finished) Matt                        Taylor 615 525 7053  me@matttaylor.com Copyright© Matt                    Taylor 2004   |  |  
 |