| 
 
        
          
            | 
                 
                  | revisiting 
                      the American cabin |  
                 
                  | 1967 
                      • 1975 • 1979 • 2002 |  
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Sometimes 
                          an architectural idea hangs around long enough that 
                          it gets real intense about getting built. I keep coming 
                          back to this one. Maybe 2003 is the time. This project 
                          is an effective way to prototype several useful concepts: 
                          Temporary foundations; prefabricated movable building 
                          (+/- 100 pieces); “breathable” exterior 
                          membrane; contoured, non-flat floors; self-contained, 
                          off-the-grid, energy alternatives; greenhouse food production; 
                          and, a non-traditional space form-factor. The EcoSphere 
                          is a true “EarthShip” concept; it is conceived 
                          to move and rest (for awhile) gently on the Earth and 
                          then economically move again. |  |  
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | The 
                          membrane is the most challenging and, perhaps, interesting 
                          aspect of this design. All exterior walls, of any building, 
                          are indeed membranes for they do not keep everything 
                          in or out. And, in this era of so-called energy efficiency, 
                          we try to do that; which is not how nature works - consider 
                          your skin as an example; it is a sophisticated input/output 
                          organ, the largest of the entire body. Attempting to 
                          build absolute barriers is neither possible nor efficient 
                          and certainly not healthy. The interior air quality 
                          and compounding of pollutants in the average building 
                          is a scandal just waiting for its time. The SKIN 
                          of EcoSphere is to be made up of a series of semi-permeable 
                          materials that allow different gasses (via partial pressures) 
                          and radiation (light & heat) to pass in and out 
                          as conditions warrant. The building BREATHS 
                          as is required for comfort and health. Besides this 
                          being a far more effective strategy for energy management, 
                          this embodies LIFE into the building by bringing 
                          a life-like aspect to it. Permeability will 
                          be achieved two ways: first by the materials themselves 
                          directly responding to air, light and temperature and 
                          adjusting in various ways, secondly, by the external 
                          panels, related to the geodesic architecture, opening 
                          and closing by user instruction and programmed protocols. 
                          The “pure” geometry shown in the pictures 
                          of the model, therefore, will never actually be seen 
                          this way as the building will always be “articulating” 
                          as it seeks the optimum balancing of internal and external 
                          energies. This is the skin strategy for Wideness 
                          Mega City although on a much larger scale than Ecophere. |  |  
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | The 
                          interior space of EcoSphere provides and entirely different 
                          experience than the typical residential concept. 
                          It is related, in this regard, to Domicile, the Bay 
                          Area Studio and Gail’s Nest projects. This concept 
                          rejects the “flatness” of floors and walls 
                          and their being treated a intrinsically different elements. 
                          WHY? Other than some building conventions that 
                          derive from primitive mathematical and fabrication means, 
                          what argument is there that dictates this design assumption 
                          as a default practice? The space of EcoSphere is continuous 
                          and punctuated with linear elements. These two aspects, 
                          together set up a dynamic that can be crafted so as 
                          to make the exact sensibility required for each sub-space, 
                          of the entire environment, respond exactly to its real 
                          conditions as they change. The old concept of floors, 
                          walls, ceilings gives way to the structure providing 
                          in each PLACE the combination of shape, finish, 
                          form and texture appropriate for what is happening there. 
                          The “view” in and out of the structure - 
                          through a MEMBRANE that, itself, will “read” 
                          as much an IDEA as a thing - is also shaped 
                          to BE what the function requires not what a 
                          pre-determined form-factor dictates. |  |  
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Look 
                          at the flower as architecture. I submit to you we have 
                          no concept of ARCHITECTURE. With all our pride 
                          in technology, we are humbled by a single flower. This 
                          is the standard by which we should judge our works not 
                          the petty arguments that take place between one school 
                          of “architecture” and another. Here is the 
                          standard for structure, form, color, function and shear 
                          imagination and beauty. The EcoSphere model is but an 
                          outline, a form, an idea. The task ahead is to render 
                          it with the diversity and joy that nature employs. This, 
                          then, is the work and the criteria of success. EcoSphere 
                          was conceived to be a modern version of traditional 
                          nomadic architecture. The idea was “housing” 
                          that can go anywhere and be organic 
                          in its relationship to the planet. As such, a place 
                          to enjoy nature without imposing all the industrial 
                          society infrastructure costs on it. We have miles to 
                          go in this regard; EcoSphere can be an experiment and 
                          a step toward this goal. As a society, we have assumed 
                          that high economic and ecological infrastructure costs 
                          are an intrinsic consequence of a high standard of living. 
                          We have not realized that this is true only in the context 
                          of our present development and infrastructure design 
                          strategies. If we want different results we have to 
                          design based on intrinsically different criteria. EcoSphere 
                          will not solve all the problem of this domain; this 
                          will require a much greater scope. It can start a process 
                          and be a demonstration. It can be more like a flower 
                          and less like a mechanical thing. |  |  
                 
                  | EcoSpere 
                      background:Architectural Projects # 63 
                      
                      1970s 
                      Concepts
 |  
                 
                  | Matt 
                    Taylor knOwhere @Palo Alto
 December 8, 2002
 
                      
                        | 
                             
                              | SolutionBox 
                                  voice of this document:VISION • STRATEGY • DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
 |  |  
 posted 
                      December 8, 2002 revised 
                      December 8, 2002• 20021208.252296.mt •
 (note: 
                      this document is about 5% finished) copyright© 
                      Matt Taylor 1967, 1975, 1979, 2002 |  |  
 |