from the Archives
Renascence Reports
 
 
INDEX
part two of two
with annotations from a 28 year perspective
 
 
The first five issues of Renascence Reports cover the basic idea of the Project and its time of initial growth. The five issues, below, document the ambitions of the Project and our struggle to find the right match between resources, projects and (new) organizational ability. Issue #10 highlights an organization attempt (that ultimately did not sustain) and the question of success or failure. It also documents the circumstance of Renascence starting to have influence outside of Kansas City.
 
The Renascence Project was literally overwhelmed with opportunities. Lacking an organizational practice (we had the model) that was sophisticated enough to deal with the challenges presented by this complexity, we were forced to pull back to a more limited scope of operations. This, however, lacked the critical mass required by the idea of the project - we missed getting to our first plateau that would have provided a temporary stability. We were aware of these circumstances but not free of their consequences. If this consolidation could have worked or not is an interesting question - in the end, people voted with their feet. The Westport Common Project was a great drain on the Renascence Project and several of its members. It was way too big a venture for us at the time involving a two square block redevelopment. We actually came very close to making it happen. It was perhaps foolish it take it on and I was initially reluctant to do so. There were two aspects that swayed me to try. First, this was the first major initiative that had come “bottom up” from Renascence members. I felt that is was my obligation to support the project given the premise and the “promise” of the Renascence. Second, at stake was the destruction of a building that once gone cannot be replaced. remember, this was the 70s and restoration was not what it is today. Developers want the land to do a allow quality piece of work that disgraces the intersection of 39th and Main to this day. We fought a good battle against the developer and we lost. Even given what it cost us, it was the right thing to do. I would do it again if given the option. At the time and place it was a mission critical choice.
 
More comments on this project and reflections on other aspects of the renascence experiene are annotated on the full screen views of each page.
 
click on each page for full screen view
Vol. 1, No 6

NOTE:
# 6 is misplaced

anyone with a copy please
notify me

Vol. 1, No 7

Page 1 - Face:

aaaaa

 

Page 2:

aaaaa

 

Page 3:

aaaaa

 

Page 4 & 5 - Centerfold:

aaaaa

Page 6:

aaaaa

 

Page 7:

aaaaa

 

Page 8 - Back:

aaaaa

 

Vol. 1, No 8

Page 1 - Face:

aaaaa

 

Page 2:

aaaaa

 

Page 3:

aaaaa

 

Page 4 & 5 - Centerfold:

aaaaa

Page 6:

aaaaa

 

Page 7:

aaaaa

 

Page 8 - Back:

aaaaa

 

Vol. 1, No 9

Page 1 - Face:

aaaaa

 

Page 2:

aaaaa

 

Page 3:

aaaaa

 

Page 4 & 5 - Centerfold:

aaaaa

Page 6:

aaaaa

 

Page 7:

aaaaa

 

Page 8 - Back:

aaaaa

 

Vol. 1, No 10

Page 1 - Face:

After a gap in publishing, this issue reported a number of changes in the Renascence organization and several trips by myself and Gail which lead to the creation of MG Taylor.

The picture is of Bucky and me debating Domicile at Davis in 1978.

click on page for more notes

Page 2:

aaaaa

 

Page 3:

aaaaa

 

Page 4 & 5 - Centerfold:

aaaaa

Page 6:

aaaaa

ecosphere_and_renascence

Page 7:

EcoSphere Project
EcoSphere Greenhouse
Domicile Project
MLU Project
Helix Mega City design
Laura Starr
Bob Cinque

These projects were at the core of Renascence concepts for sustaionable and affordable urban architecture.

success_or_failure

Page 8 - Back:

aaaaa

 

 
In January of 179, Gail decided that she wanted to leave the Learning Exchange, which had co-founded, and Kansas City. She had spent her entire life there and wanted to explore a broader arena. She felt that she was “finished” with the Exchange and it was ready to continue without her. I felt that the Renascence Project needed another year of my involvement.
 
We decide that we would spend Saturday mornings looking at our options and planning our future until an opportunity emerged that fit both of us. By this time, there were a number of interesting
 
 
 
requires
 
 
Return to part one of Renascense Reports
Return to INDEX
GoTo: Renascence Reports
Index - part one of two
Renascence Era Notebooks
1974 to1979
Birth of An Idea
Bootstrap Into Space
Dome Dwellings and Workplaces
Domicile One - CoHousing Alternative
EcoSphere Bungalow
EcoSphere Greenhouse
Kansas City Strip and Master Plan Process
Master Planning Process
Matt Taylor - Hand Written Notebooks Index
Mega Cities
The Monkey’s Paw
Planetary Architecture - The Case
Quest
Rate of Change
ReBuilding the Future
Steinmeyer House - off the grid - first try
Weak Signals
Worthy Problems
 
Matt Taylor
Elsewhere
July 19, 2005
 

 

SolutionBox voice of this document:
INSIGHT • POLICY • PROGRAM

 

 

posted: July 19, 2005

revised: July 20, 2005
• 20050705.667621.mt • 20050720.879956.mt •
• 20050721.111100.mt •

(note: this document is about 50% finished)

Copyright© Matt Taylor 1977, 1978, 2005

 

 

Search For:
Match:  Any word All words Exact phrase
Sound-alike matching
Dated:
From: ,
To: ,
Within: 
Show:   results   summaries
Sort by: